Friday, August 26, 2016

Om Mani Padme Political Correctnesss

John Craig, right again as usual. How about the below? You can't argue with it once you give it some thought — Political Correctness is a religion, any way you look at it, so we might as well use the fact when we can. But how? Most PCites are, frankly, too damn dumb to know what you mean when you tell them they have a religion. They'll just tell you they don't and that you're a bigot. Maybe the thing to do is go through the courts, and somehow establish that PCism is a religion. You could even, like John suggests, prove that it's a religion because it insists on believing in the equality of men and women despite heaps of scientific evidence to the contrary, just like other irrational religions require of their followers.

Of course, PCism, like so many religions, isn't taken seriously by its own leaders — the PC Pope is an atheist, that sort of thing — but that doesn't make it any less of a religion. PCism was put together in order to further an alliance of anti-Western things that have often been called communism or Marxism. None of that stuff has any intrinsic importance to anybody. All elements of it are judged by their usefulness in the struggle to destroy Western Civilization. Right now, PCism is defending both homosexuality and Islam, despite the fact that they pretty much hate each other, because both is a good weapon against PCism's true enemy, Western Civilization. And I have strayed from the point yet again.

This is from Just Not Said [link].

The new religion

Christianity's hold on the West has been weakening for generations now.

But a new religion seems to have taken its place: political correctness. This religion espouses the essentially supernatural belief that there are no significant differences between men and women, or between the races. It preaches that biological reality has nothing to do with gender. And it sermonizes that examining statistical differences between various groups of people makes someone evil.

In this new religion, Satan has been more of less replaced by an entire group of people: white males. All social evils must be ascribed to that group.

Throughout history, most people have just gone along with the religion they're raised in, because it's instilled in them from an early age that this is what decent people believe. If you disbelieve, you go to hell. And even if you don't entirely buy into the concept of an afterlife, well, why take the chance? Even more importantly, veering from your religious roots would result in social ostracism. And for most people, that is a sort of hell.

An awful lot of people seem to subscribe to political correctness for essentially the same reasons. They have been taught that this is the mindset that decent people have. People who stray from the PC fold are essentially demonized with labels like "racist" and "sexist" and "ageist" and so on.

These terms are flung about with the same combination of horror and shock and prim disapproval that earlier generations flung about the terms "godless" and "heathen" and "harlot" and "fallen woman" and "bastard."

And, voicing doubts about PC-ism might result in becoming a social -- and sometimes, even professional -- outcast.

So, politically correct types dare not allow themselves to see the obvious. If any contrary thought does creep into their heads ("hmm, after all this talk of racism, maybe our diversity isn't our strength") it is quickly banished.

Most people view other religions, but not their own, as a bunch of silly superstitions. For instance, the idea of getting 72 virgins in Paradise is often mocked by Westerners. But, what, precisely, does Christianity's concept of heaven entail? It's generally unspecified, but for most people, well, limitless sex might be an appealing part of the package.

Likewise with PC-ism: it is regarded by its adherents as the one true way. It is other belief systems which are silly superstitions. Any scientific findings that contradict PC-ism, no matter how well-documented and rigorously proven, are quickly labelled "pseudoscientific" by PC-ites -- because there is no room for doubt in any religion.

The only thing different about PC-ism as a religion is that it prides itself on not being one.

Make no mistake: it is.
----------
Quibcag: Nun is Maria Takayama from Haganai (はがない).

#AltRightMeans

It still  blows my mind that the term "Alt-right" was used by Hillary. Such conservative ideas/vocabulary are usually completely ignored by the likes of Hillary for decades if not forever.

But now it's out so we have to define it. Easy enough. First, it's short for "alternative right."  It's what I used to call the real right, because the alt-right is a Keeper of the Flame, a collection of real right-wingers of one sort or another whose main purpose is to keep the right going and convince people that the "neoconservatives" are most certainly not conservatives in any sense at all, but just a species of liberal.

Hillary, of course, considerers only neocons to be legitimate, because they're liberals, of her sort, even. The sort who always seem to be connected on Wall Street, and have been for some time.

Well, that's a definition, and "Disdain for Plebs" [link], has this to say about the implication:
#AltRightMeans  not having to constantly negotiate with liberals on your values when it comes to culture and race, because to them you are a racist for merely being born white. It means you understand your "white privilege" is not a privilege, but a birthright handed down by your ancestors who sought to make your life easier through thier own hard work and determination. It means not having to surrender your communities to third world migrants, because this president wants to stack the deck with Democrat voters. It means not aligning yourself with a Republican party which is happy to sell this nation to the highest corporate bidder that seeks to flood our neighborhoods with cheap South American labor. A Republican party who wants to bomb the Middle East back to the neolithic era, causing more irreversible migratory patterns. A Republican party who would rather side with a corrupt career criminal like Hillary Clinton, instead of Trump, merely because he tells everybody the unfortunate reality of our political and social environment as Americans. It means understanding liberty and freedom can sometimes only be preserved through strength, not tolerance.

The fact we're even having this discussion, the #AltRightMeans white Westerners are actually becoming racially aware in the same manner liberals encourage every other race to be, and have shamed themselves out of doing for the past 3 or 4 generations. the #AltRightMeans there is an actual difference now, between the leftwing and the rightwing. It means through the ashes of a dead party built on apathy and cowardice, an alternative is finally born. One that actually believes in self preservation, and not self destruction. I can say with confidence, the alt right means there is finally hope for a future which we've all convinced ourself has been massacred by both parties.

Ain't the Alt Right grand? The first time I heard the term I automatically knew that I was a part of it, as were most of those thinkers I most respected — Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, Joseph Sobran, etc. — the very sort of people who are both likely to be "purged" by the neocons and very unlikely to purge anybody themselves. 

But don't get the impression that the altrighters (I'm still searching for the optimum way to write the term) are all pussycats like Jared Taylor or most of the writers at Takimag — do remember that it also includes/included practically everybody we think of as conservative prior to 1968, such as Goldwater, George Lincoln Rockwell, the Klan, and Buckley before the neocons took control of him.

And it certainly includes Ex-Army. Pussycat or tiger? Time will tell.
------------
Quibcag: this is meant to suggest handing down birthrights, of course. But Gintama and Kagura aren't father and daughter, though they look like they are. They're from Gin Tama (銀魂 Gintama, lit. "Silver Soul").

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Pepe the Frog, Hitler as Buddha or Vice-Versa, the Trump Nation, and of Course Kekking

Boy, am I ever out of it these days. Not that I'm running myself down, now. Most of my life I've been ahead of the pack, sniffing out the trends before they begin to jell. I even predicted that Trump would run twenty years ago. Well, to be honest, I predicted that a wealthy businessman with no political or military experience would seize control of a nomination to shake things up. I thought it would be Ted Turner.  Is that worth a "close enough"? Better than all these Cory Booker/Julian Castro predictors, I'd say.

Give me a break, kiddies. I'm seventy. Yes, five days younger than Trump, but he's a special case of high-energy, and he has people working for him who aren't going to let him miss anything important. I"m still trying to figure out how to pronounce "SWPL," or even if I should. Or if anybody should. And what the hell is "NEET"?

So we come to Pepe the Frog. I fully admit I failed to take "cuckservative" and its derivatives seriously enough. I thought it was too vulgar to catch on. But catch it did, because it is simply the perfect word to describe that type typified by Jeb! (Can a type be typified?), and it's already to the point where people are using it without knowing what it's supposed to mean at all.

Yes, Pepe the Frog. I didn't forget. The question is, is he significant or just a distraction? My instincts this time are to go against my instincts and say yes, he's important, because look at the Trump-as-Pepe drawing in the  quibcag. Trump's important, ergo Pepe is important.

Anyhow (and here I refer to the upcoming excerpt, unless I decided to reprint the whole thing), I always did take Savitri Devi seriously, and a case can evidently be made for lumping, as opposition to the Zeitgeist, Savitri Devi, Trump, Pepe, Hinduism (in a completely different manifestation from that of Camp of the Saints), and not Buddhism, really, not without understanding it a lot better, anyway.

But right now it would seem that, as they say, Trump "owns" Pepe, so we'd better keep track of Pepe, whether I'm seventy years old or not.

The below, originally called to my attention by Layne Piratess Bailey [link], doesn't prove that Pepe is as significant as Savitri Devi, but it at least suggests the possibility. I'm beginning to think that I have a knee-jerk aversion to Pepe because he's drawn way more crudely than the Baloo half of this team ever draws anything. And, this has got to be irrelevant, but the "kekking" referred to below reminds me of a totally different kind of "kekking" in Loglan, which you might remember if you're one of the eleven people on Earth still interested in Loglan. Who drew the guy with the net? Hm? [link]. Enough blather. This is from Atlantic Centurion:

Esoteric Kekism, or Kek as a Bodhisattva of Racial Enlightenment

Savitri Devi Mukherji (1905-1982), born Maximine Julia Portaz in France, was a national socialist writer and activist who lived in India during WWII and took a deep interest in Hinduism as the only extant example of Aryan polytheism. After the war, she went on a “pilgrimage” through Europe to sites associated with national socialism and published her magnum opus, The Lightning and the Sun (1958). A foundational text of Esoteric Hitlerism, the book presents a syncretic worldview combining national socialism, anti-humanism, vegetarianism, a Nietzschean rejection of Christianity, both religious anti-Judaism and racial anti-Semitism, the notion of cyclical time found in the Dharmic religions, and biographies of Mongol warlord Genghis Khan (Lightning), the Egyptian pharaoh and sun-worshipper Akhnaton (Sun), and Adolf Hitler (Lightning and Sun). Perhaps most famously, The Lightning and the Sun details the prophecy of Kalki the Destroyer—the final incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu—who will succeed Hitler and end the Kali Yuga (Dark Age/Age of Gloom).
A brief note on the Lightning and Sun concepts, and that of Time. Devi describes Men in Timeas Lightning. One who embodies Lightning does not move against the direction of Time and the ongoing decline into a world of violence and suffering, but moves in unison with Time in a way approaching perfection. She describes Genghis Khan, for example, not as a man of any grand ideological principles but one who merely acted in the interest of himself and his kinsmen, and did so with the utmost power and application of that power. Men above Time, who embody the Sun, are those who transcend the conditions of the Dark Age and hold to a truth that is independent of Time. Devi considers Akhnaton, the pharaoh of Egypt who attempted to start a new cult of monotheistic sun-worship, to be the most salient example of Sun. She sees his sun worship as something that is scientifically and metaphysically accurate—and therefore Truth—because the sun is the source of all energy on Earth, and therefore life itself. The religious revolution of Akhnaton died within a generation or so after him, as he had not lived long enough to cement it or been forceful enough in doing so. Finally, Devi considers Hitler a Man against Time—both Lightning and Sun—as he had embraced the violent means of the Dark Age and held an ideology of truth that was against the Dark Age. She describes him as the penultimate avatar of Vishnu, who will be succeeded by someone equally Lightning and Sun (Hitler was more Sun according to Devi).
Historian of the occult Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke describes Devi as “Hitler’s priestess,” which is the title of his biography of her and a fairly accurate description of her vocation. She essentially wanted to create a religion out of national socialism that could be followed during the postwar era to keep the truth and memory (as she saw it) of Hitler alive. This is an extreme challenge on a number of levels in that it entails: 1.) conversion to a new religion, 2.) getting members of the postwar population to embrace national socialism, which is reflexively opposed by most, and 3.) Hitler being an avatar of Vishnu.
I have a better idea, and I am only half-joking. While I find Devi’s theological national socialism intriguing, I think at our stage of the Kali Yuga (which according to her has been ongoing through all of recorded history), we need to adopt an approach which is appropriate to the times we live in and the attitudes of our people and culture. That is to say, I think something like Vishnu-Hitler is just too esoteric for any kind of mass consumption and is better left as a hermetic thing. The interest in the Dharmic religions, however, I think is something worth pursuing, for reasons similar to hers: 1.) they are directly descended from ancient Aryan faiths, 2.) they have resisted the encroachment of Abrahamic monotheism, and 3.) they are present in extant nationalist countries such as Japan and India.

Buddhism as an Indo-Aryan Tradition

Westerners, especially SWPLS, really like the idea of Buddhism (certainly more than the intensely alien Hinduism), which in its purest form is more philosophical than religious and teaches a balance between indulgence and asceticism, and that the meaning of life is to escape from the cycle of rebirth by reaching enlightenment. Comparisons of Jesus Christ and the Shakyamuni Buddha are legion, as both were charismatic leaders who founded religions of escapism. Thus for many Westerners, Buddhism does not feel intensely alien, and syncretism is common. Some people have no issue identifying as “Christian Buddhists,” for example. The the popularity of Buddhism or Buddhist teachings in the West is thus a kind of archaeofuturism, a truth from the past asserting itself in the present.
esoteric-kekism-8
An Indo-Greek standing Buddha (1st or 2nd Century).
If I am not mistaken, Buddhism first broke into modern mainstream Western society in the 1960s with the hippie movement, though most of those people deeply misunderstood it as much as they did everything else. The enduring popularity of Buddhism among Westerners—best observed through the proliferation of yoga, meditation, and various forms of counter-signaling against consumerist norms—is interesting as it comes at a time when materialism has reached deeply disgusting and alienating levels—and when strict obedience to monotheistic religious texts and customs is waning (though still dominant). Buddhism thus becomes a natural fit for many atomized people in our society, owing to its radical departure from the norm and message of self-enlightenment. Again though, most Westerners have a completely superficial understanding of Buddhism—one so bastardized it might as well be considered an offshoot set of beliefs centered on being vaguely marxist and anti-tradition rather than committed to enlightenment.
I think elements of Buddhism and its heritage—when correctly understood—could be repurposed in ways pertinent to our cause and fashioned into something appealing. Siddhārtha Gautama (563 BC–483 BC, or 480 BC–400 BC), the founder of Buddhism, was a member of the kshatriya caste (warrior aristocracy) born in the northeast of late Vedic India. He lived in the Kingdom of Magadha, which was an ancient Indo-Aryan state located near what is now Nepal. Buddha is described as having blue eyes and a beautiful complexion, which to this day in the East—even before the time of modern European colonialism—means fair and light skin. The physical appearance of the Buddha indicates he must have had Aryan ancestry even centuries after the ancient migration into India.
esoteric-kekism-9
Detail of the above statue’s head.
Thus Buddhism has roots in our distant pan-racial past, albeit a non-European one. Savitri Devi considered the Buddha to be a Man above Time (rather than a Man in Time or a Man against Time) as he had a conception of the world opposed to the Kali Yuga, but was not willing to use the methods of the Dark Age to achieve it.

Overview of Buddhist Philosophy and Cosmology

An extremely basic overview of Buddhist beliefs is necessary at this point. I will not attempt to detail the various sects (Theravāda, Mahāyāna, Vajrayāna, Tibetan, Zen) but provide general concepts shared by them, or most of them. If Buddhists of one sect believe something Buddhists of another sect reject, one can still say Buddhists believe it. From the top, Buddha taught that there are three kinds of suffering in earthly life:
  1. Suffering caused by pain (especially bodily)
  2. Suffering caused by change (e.g. the loss of something enjoyed)
  3. Suffering caused by conditions (e.g. fear, anxiety, dependence, lack of control, loneliness, etc.)
More famous are the Four Noble Truths he taught:
  1. Reality of Suffering – the three sufferings of pain, change, and conditions
  2. Cause of Suffering – having a false attitude towards reality, such as desire or ignorance
  3. End of Suffering – awakening to the truth
  4. Path of Ending Suffering – the Middle Way (or the more detailed Eightfold Path of right view, intention, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and concentration)
Some elaboration on ending suffering and the path to ending suffering is necessary. Nirvānais the end of suffering brought about by awakening to the truths of non-duality, emptiness, and non-self, among others too varied or localized to fairly cover from a religion over 2000 years-old and spread across all Asia. Nirvāna means escape from samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth. The Middle Way, or non-duality, is an understanding of cosmic order that relies on balance between extremes, e.g. hedonism and asceticism, self-indulgence and self-deprivation. Emptiness is the understanding that there is nothing intrinsic to existence of anything. Non-self, more accurately a kind of interdependence, is the understanding that you have no permanent self.
In other words, one can strive to end their suffering through changing their thoughts and deeds in a lifetime to align with the Buddha’s teachings. This may lead to nirvāna, the complete escape from suffering, or reincarnation into a new life which is closer to that nirvāna.
One area in which a lot of popular Western conceptions of Buddhism go horribly wrong is understanding the end of suffering as meaning a state of comfort. But this is really just an extension of our false-obsession with comfort and convenience as the greatest things in life. So these Buddhism enthusiasts take the religion as a means of becoming comfortable, by meditating or spending less money on consumer goods, and by using Buddhist teachings as justification. If one had understanding of non-duality and impermanence they would know the opposite of suffering isn’t merely comfort, and moreover they would know comfort is a temporary state, which will be succeeded by the pain of not being comfortable. In fact, being too attached to the idea of comfort would be a disastrous detour from the path to nirvāna and could leave one worse off.
In Buddhist cosmology there are six major realms of life, most of which are located on Jambudvīpa, the great world-continent of humanity and other animals. Achieving nirvāna is most possible for mankind because they already exist in a kind of balance between the heaven and hell realms. A human could become liberated in one lifetime, or move down or up in the cosmic order. Downward, one could be reborn into a lower station or caste (racial or class), or as an animal, an evil spirit, or in hell. Moving upward, one might become higher caste, or a god or a demi-god in the holy mountains, or achieve nirvāna and become totally liberated from death-rebirth cycle.
One’s conditions of rebirth are contingent upon their karma, which means “action” in Sanskrit but in actually refers to a broader cause-and-effect system. Based on one’s actions of body, speech, and mind (or intention), he accumulates good or bad karma (in addition to karmacarried over from unknowable past lives). Karma is generated constantly throughout one’s life, and determines  lifespan, quality of life and events in life. This doesn’t mean that generating good karma is the ticket to a better life across the board, as karma from past lives can still have an impact. Dying with bad karma leads to a regressive reincarnation while good karmaleads to a progressive reincarnation—or it should unless bad deeds of past lives were bad enough to cancel out any good of the current life.
The implications of a karmic world as opposed to the world of anthropomorphic gods are massive, and too much to deal with here, but suffice to say a world in which our stations are given to us by the choices of our pasts (in the broadest sense)  rather than from a top-down source of authority seems to me an archaeo-Darwinian conception of cosmic order. And karmicreincarnation, while at first a strange notion to Western man, is not actually that unthinkable either given how the Semitic religions followed by most of mankind, such as Christianity, believe in bodily resurrection of the faithful to live in communion with the creator god and among some sects damnation in a hell realm as punishment for earthly sins. That certainly bears a strong similarity to Buddhism. And thinking Darwinianly, are we not reincarnated in our descendants, who will carry expressions of at least some of our genetic material for all their lives, just as we carry that of our ancestors? Reincarnation is thus more real than resurrection from this perspective.
Lastly there are some practical issues concerned with achieving nirvāna. It is the teachings of the Buddha, or dharma, which lead to awakening from samsara, the death-rebirth cycle. Dharma is another Sanskrit word, but there is no single rendering into English. “Cosmic law and order” is one possible interpretation, and sometimes the expression buddha-dharma is used for clarity. Now of course, the Buddha no longer exists in a way we can learn from him personally, which means the buddha-dharma must be conveyed some other way. This is where the concept of the bodhisattva comes in, often understood to be a Buddhist analogy to the the Christian saint. This is partially true if one limits their category of Christian saints to the evangelists, such as St. John or St. Patrick. A bodhisattva is a great teacher who is yet to reach enlightenment, and teaches other the dharma necessary to liberate themselves. Upāya, or “skillful means,” refers to the liberative technique used by the bodhisattva so that his student(s) can understand the dharma.
Because of karmic differences between all living beings as a result of their accumulated karma over all lifetimes, there is no single way to perfectly teach the dharma so that it is comprehended and leads to awakening. A bodhisattva needs a deep understanding of karma in order to teach others the dharma so that they may understand it, based on their own circumstances. Recalling the Christian evangelist-saints, some are believed to have used miracles to teach the Gospel, the Good News. Others, such as St. Patrick, had what a Buddhist would call upāya—consider the shamrock used to explain the triune god to illiterate peasants so that they might “be saved” in Jesus Christ. Was that not a skillful means of conversion? To this day the shamrock remains a symbol of Christianity in Ireland almost 2000 years later…
Much of Buddhism (and other Dharmic religions) is very fanciful and miraculous sounding to the postmodern ear, and so we cannot in good faith take most of it as anything more than allegorical of some eternal truth being expressed in a particular way shaped by the space, time, and society it flows from. But my intentions above in providing this survey of Buddhism were not to convince you of the truth of all of Buddhism or that you should adopt it—rather I sought to explain the basic concepts as I understand them so that you might understand them (or my understanding of them).

Skillful Means as Skillful Memes

I think the concepts of skillful means and teaching others so that they might achieve enlightenment are very important, and that Buddhism frames them in a way that can deeply resonate with people. For those of us involved in White  nationalism and the Alt-Right, the value and importance of the war of ideas, metapolitical warfare, is tantamount. It is necessary to teach people our truths—truths about race, sex, society, culture, and the fate of the West—and to skillfully do so with finesse and impact. We embrace whatever methods that we’ve been furnished with or seek out innovative ways of using them, with the goal of converting people to our cause—the global liberation of our race from suffering under hostile occupation. From Twitter, to comments sections, to naive reporters, to printers and fax machines, we turn no vehicle of communication away.
The movement has grown tremendously over the last year, owing in no small part to the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, and the effective use of him as a springboard for our message. His abrasive style, nationalistic fervor, and paternal-authoritarian ethos approach the  kind of sovereign power that would be necessary to achieve victory over our enemies, which terrifies them. His entrancement of the media through 4D chess has brought us ancillary spotlight, as highly-trafficked media outlets broadcast our unfiltered propaganda into the ether. They assume they are merely drawing attention to “evil racist Trump supporters” in an attempt to discredit him, but in practice they are broadcasting our memes. They cannot bring themselves to suppress the Truth, for it shocks them so much after years of dormancy.
What has enabled the substantial growth of the Alt-Right and nationalism are skillful memes, our skillful means in the form of crafting quality propaganda ideas and images which can be consumed and forwarded across the screens and minds of the people. I was quoted in the New York Times earlier this year about the glorious liberative technique of our skillful memes:
Take it from the alt-right bloggers themselves. The movement is “winning the meme war,” an alt-right blogger calling himself Lawrence Murray wrote last month.
I, a humble effortposter, having worked for our cause scarcely a year, had his name and prose ascended to the heights of American journalism, through no more efforts than I would have expended any other day on any other content I write.
And I was not alone. We have had a number of successes reported in the mainline press, which seem to transcend ordinary explanations for a movement that largely does not exist outside of social media and bars. From outlets covering the term “Alt-Right” (which has 15,000 results on Google News up from virtually none last year and its own Wikipedia page), to getting (((establishment climbers))) to identify themselves on social media using the triple parentheses from the taken-down Coincidence Detector plugin for Google Chrome, to the Tay AI controversy, to the spread of the #cuckservative meme, to Donald Trump retweeting a stylized portrait of himself as Pepe the Frog, the memes have prevailed.
esoteric-kekism-2
Pepe depicted in the form of Donald Trump, retweeted by the man himself.
And that is when things get interesting. When we know that the memes have taken on a superhuman will of their own that simply cannot be controlled. When we have entered the realm of meme magick, the occult world of metapolitical subversion. That is when we know we have born witness to an incarnation of the ancient Egyptian frog god of chaos, Kek, who expresses himself in our time to the youth of nation through meme magick, in the avatar of Pepe the Frog.

Pepe as an Avatar of Kek, the Source of Meme Magick

esoteric-kekism-10
An early depiction of Pepe in black-and-white.
The story of Pepe the Frog begins in 2005, when he was merely a anthropomorphic frog created by American cartoonist Matt Furie. Pepe appeared in a comic book called Boy’s Club, which depicted the life of four NEET roommates. He became a popular meme on a certain imageboard and was later taken up by normies on blogging platform associated with intersectional feminist basketweaving.
Because Pepe was humorous, people would reply “kek” to images they enjoyed, with “kek” itself being a meme-ish way of saying “lol” that derives from the orcish race of World of Warcraft. Pepe, of whom there are endless variations and meme mutations both common and rare, received tremendous keks from the people across the world wide web. But many of those who had taken up Pepe as their meme were idolators and vile normies.
pepe-trs
An Atlantic Centurion original Pepe.
Thankfully, the trve right launched a campaign to retake Pepe from the heretical normies and restore him to his chanological birthplace as a chaotic and politically incorrect meme. The big moment came during the Republican primaries, when Trump retweeted a Pepe version of himself, which only made our enemies even more flustered. At this time, Pepe had already become known as a “nazi frog meme” that #frogtwitter users and members of the Alt-Right were using to spread propaganda and troll leftists and Jews.
Olivia Nuzzi from the Daily Beast, who our goys have trolled on Twitter, wrote an article about a single fucking Trump tweet in May called “How Pepe the Frog Became a Nazi Trump Supporter and Alt-Right Symbol.” She quotes @JaredTSwift at length:
“In a sense, we’ve managed to push white nationalism into a very mainstream position,” he said. “Trump’s online support has been crucial to his success, I believe, and the fact is that his biggest and most devoted online supporters are white nationalists. Now, we’ve pushed the Overton window. People have adopted our rhetoric, sometimes without even realizing it. We’re setting up for a massive cultural shift.”
Many keks were had by the Alt-Right when this article was published. And it was not the only of its kind. Now millions of normies knew that Pepe did not belong to them, that he was a property of the nationalist right and untouchable as it would destroy their status-siganling ability if they associated with him. Pepe had trascended the normies.
esoteric-kekism-3
Kek in human form, right.
So how does this become esoteric? Well, Kek is also an Ancient Egyptian pagan god. He is one of the eight primordial deities of the Old Kingdom, a god of darkness representing the unknown and chaos that come before the light. Moreover, in his male form he is depicted as a frog or a man with the head of a frog. Now, no one deliberately made the kek-yielding Pepe into Kek; it just kind of arouse out of the ether, which is what makes it so interesting. If one acknowledges the notion of cyclical time believed by the non-Semitic religions of the world, one can understand that the nationalist Pepe meme is a return of Kek the chaos-bringer, who may well represent Kalki the Destroyer, bringer of the end of the Dark Age.
esoteric-kekism-11
Trump’s projected 1488 delegate count before the Republication National Convention. Praise Kek!
Kek is the deity of chaotic meme magick, which is a form of metapolitical prayer and will-to-power. Metapolitics is the process of trying to change the culture and values of a society as opposed to pure political activism. And Pepe is a modern-day icon of Kek, who shitlords project their wishes unto and send icons of into the digital ether.
Memes are in their original definition things or phrases people believe in. So meme magick, essentially, is the repetition of memes enough to change the memes that other people believe in, or memeing something into reality. The meme becomes a mantra, something chanted to generate karma.
The explosive growth of Pepe, his association with the nationalist right, and his estrangement from the normies solidified his place in the esoteric tradition. The normies had tried to seize upon this avatar of Kek as a source of mindless and indifferent entertainment, but Kek reasserted himself as on the side of Truth and liberation through the chaos of meme magick. Thus, Pepe became inaccessible to the normies, for in rejecting the Truth they had rejected Kek, and could no longer try to lay claim to a “nazi frog meme.”

Kek as the Bodhisattva of Aryan Nirvāna

esoteric-kekism-1
What Kek does for us, should we offer our voices and our keystrokes to him, is bless us with the tempered chaos of meme-upāya—skillful memes—to spread our ideas among our people. These ideas we spread are the kek-dharma—the redpill if you will— and the teachings necessary to understanding the world and achieving our rightful independence in it. Kek manifests himself to us in the avatar Pepe, a bodhisattva, a great spirtual teacher of the truth and wisdom of national liberation through the application of meme magick. With his meme-upāya, Kek teaches us how karma generated by memes as a mantra will help us to achieve liberation. Liberation means an end to mosaic samsara—the cycle of death and rebirth which destroyed the Roman Empire, collapsed the Holy Roman Empire into a spiral of sectarian violence from which it never recovered, and devoured the Third Reich. And this cycle continues through the ongoing invasion of Europe by the third Semitic monotheism, Islam.
esoteric-kekism-4
How Aryan Nirvāna feels.
Only by understanding the kek-dharmacan the goyim realize complete and total Aryan Nirvāna, Aryan liberation, which is brought about by the creation of the karmic nation.
Free of mosaic samsara, the karmic nation will reject the psychological terrorism of third-worldism (ethno-masochism and xenophilia), and be a place where the glorious deeds and memories of our ancestors can be restored and their will-to-power reincarnated into our descendants. No more will racial suicide be spoken of as a noble ideal in a state governed by those with meme-upāya,  where the kek-dharma has achieved its rightful place as the acknowledged truth and cosmic order, in a karmic nation.
The karmic nation, by continuing the archaeo-Darwinian work of rebirth into higher forms approaching total perfection and liberation from suffering, will allow us to forge our people into Übermenschmaterial. Such will be the path to complete liberation, Aryan Nirvāna.
esoteric-kekism-5
Meme magick as foretold 4000 years ago.
It is the Kek the Bodhisattva who can teach our people these truths, if we are willing to listen and to commit ourselves to the generation of meme magick through karmic morality and through the mantra of memes. By refusing to cuck and by rejecting the foul mindsets of our invaders and terrorizers, we will move the nation away from its suffering under the pains of hostile occupation, and closer and closer to its final rebirth. If instead, our people cuck and adopt the foul mindsets, they will generate not Aryan karma but further mosaic samsara.
The trve power of skillful memes is to meme the karmic nation into reality, the process of meme magick. By spreading and repeating the meme mantra, it is possible to generate the karma needed for the rebirth of the nation.
esoteric-kekism-7
Understanding the kek-dharma through meme-upāya is the only escape from the Cave.
The manifestion of the karmic nation will be possible only through the birth of Men against Time, of whom there will be more and more as the kek-dharma spreads, through the relentless application of skillful memes and of righteous adherence to the kek-dharma, which as I have said will generate karma. When our people are filled with the Lightning and the Sun, when they possess both meme-upāya and the kek-dharma, the coming of the Aryan Nirvāna will be at hand and the karmic nation shall be unstoppable.
Praise Kek, the bringer of chaos and skillful memes. Bless us with the meme-upāya to make the karmic nation a reality
Hail Victory and Aryan Nirvāna.
-------------
Quibcag: Do you seriously expect me to keep track of all the elements of this thing? Come on, kids, I'm seventy!

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

The Clinton Murder Machine

You think I'm kidding, don't you? Or maybe that I'm just referring to the many thousands killed by bombs during Willy's terms and/or Hillary's similar bombing during Obama's terms. Bombing and other military activity that of course have killed lots of Americans as well as those vague Muslims whose lives don't matter at all till they immigrate here, whereupon their lives seem to become far more important than any of ours.

No. Everybody knows about all that but nobody seems to care except right-wing bigots like me, who'd prefer not to bomb all those Muslims, because, unlike liberals and neocons, we actually respect human life. I realize that such old-fashioned sensibilities are pretty feeble in comparison with new moral principles like pretending that men who pretend they're women actually are women instead of the men that they appear to be, but we're trying, honest we are.

But I'm not talking about that public-knowledge stuff. Nope.

Nor am I talking about Vince Foster —that is, I'm not talking only about Vince Foster, as there are over a hundred or so such Vince Fosters, some of them far more spectacular than plain old VF himself. What do you suppose they tell Chelsea about what happened to all those aunts and uncles?
We may never know.

Yeah, the memes are cute but unfortunately they refer to real stuff.  When I think about the silly murder conspiracy murders involving other presidents who wouldn't hurt a fly, the indifference of the press to the Clintons' misbehavior is pretty outrageous.

And no, I'm not talking about Bill's skirt-chasing, though that's connected,

I'm talking about their cold-blooded murders. And yes, there are plenty. If you think an Arkansas redneck and his hideous wife can't be as murderous as a bunch of Corleones, you are naive. This is from Takimag:

A Hot Month for Clinton’s Body Count

Donald Trump threatened to kill Hillary Clinton last Tuesday. The Secret Service came to visit him and he’s looking at five years in prison. It’s all conjecture, of course, but that passes for cold, hard evidence this election and that’s because the whole thing is rigged. The media is completely in the tank for Hillary and they neither see, nor hear, nor speak of Hillary’s evil. Hey, guys, if you’re looking for murders, check out anyone who has ever crossed the Clintons. There are about 100 cases where some intern has slept with Bill or some lawyer knew too much or some investigator got too close and boom—he shoots himself in the back of the head at the top of a mountain at four in the morning. 
The media cared about the sheer number of cases when 57 women said Bill Cosby raped them. If we brought the Hillary kill list down to 57, you’d be dealing with only the really, really spooky ones. Like the one last month where a DNC staffer, who may very well have supplied Julian Assange with the classified emails that brought massive embarrassment to the party, was shot in the back of the head in the middle of the night. 
Seth Rich was talking to his girlfriend on the phone when a gunman came up behind him, shot him to death, and left without taking anything at all. Rich was in a nice neighborhood that I’m told hadn’t had a murder in six years. The Assange link got eye rolls from the left until he personally offered a $20K reward for any information leading to an arrest. A Dutch TV host pressed Julian on this and asked if it was a murder accusation directed at Hillary and the subject quickly died.
The list of victims goes on and on and on, and Google is happy to tell you how serious the accusations are and how tenuous the link is. You’ll likely come across left-wing bias where they pooh-pooh the link, but peel back another layer and it’s only a fraction of a percent less scary than you thought. 
Take the case of John Ashe, who was choked by his own barbells in June. The U.N. official was on trial for taking bribes from Chinese billionaire David Ng, a.k.a. Ng Lap Seng. Snopes wants you to know it’s a myth that it had anything to do with Hillary and even my buddy Steve Crowder claims, “He wasn’t going to be testifying against Hillary at any time.” The NY Post disagrees and claims that “the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng.” This seems likely as an ABC News story from last year reported on Ng’s multiple visits with the Clintons in 1997 when he was photographed having meetings with them. So Ashe is looking at prison time for dealing with a corrupt billionaire who has a history with Hillary Clinton. He could likely negotiate a leaner sentence if he had some information to impart, but he wouldn’t be able to impart it if his windpipe were crushed by a barbell (who the hell gets killed by their own barbell?). 
Read the whole article here:
http://takimag.com/article/a_hot_month_for_clintons_body_count_gavin_mcinnes/print#ixzz4IGXUfJ51
---------
After printing this, I got a dissenting reply. Joel Eagelston thinks I'm wrong about this. He said there's no evidence the Clintons are serial killers. I asked:

Open question. Do you doubt that the media would continue to protect them if they were?

Joel Eagelston Yes, I doubt it very much. Very little is secret in the world anymore. All of these deaths in the "Clinton Body Count" were investigated by police who were doing their jobs. Hell, Vince Foster's death was investigated FIVE SEPARATE TIMES, with four of those investigations being conducted by Republicans and three by Clinton's political enemies. They all came to the conclusion that it was a suicide by a man unprepared for the viciousness of Washington life, and who was being set up as the fall guy for Clinton's firing of the Travel Office staffers. He spiraled into a deep depression and was good enough at hiding it that nobody noticed.

It's the same way with the other deaths on that list. Ron Brown was killed in a tragic airplane crash, but people want to believe he was shot in the head at some point as well. Paul Tully, who's usually the third or fourth name on these lists, was a 400-lb alcoholic chainsmoker, but we're supposed to find it suspicious that he died of a heart attack.

And this isn't just limited to right-wingers. I lived in Eugene, Oregon, when Minnesota Sen. Paul Wellstone died in a plane crash, and the treehugger crowd was convinced that the Republican National Committee had either sabotaged the plane or shot it down so Norm Coleman could take his seat in the Senate.

Real life deaths are often boring and banal. People feel that being shot by a lone nut or dying in a car crash or from food poisoning or whatever is too trivial an end for their heroes, so they attach all sorts of sexy-sounding and fascinating conspiracies to those deaths, so as to magnify the importance of the death.

In the Clintons' case, we have the opposite: in an effort to demonize this controversial couple, someone took everybody the Clintons ever knew who has died and strung the deaths together to make them seem like something more than they were. This often includes word games such as changing "died from a heart attack" to "died under mysterious circumstances. Later ruled a 'heart attack'" or saying someone committed suicide when they didn't. People are in a such a rush to hate the Clintons that they seize on it as proof of their evil or whatever.
----------
Who's right here — MacInnes or Eagelton? My indecision is palpable, but I tend to think that Hillary would at least like to be a mass murderer.

Actual quibcag: Cute, huh? Found girl at Reddit.

The Clinton Murder Machine

You think I'm kidding, don't you? Or maybe that I'm just referring to the many thousands killed by bombs during Willy's terms and/or Hillary's similar bombing during Obama's terms. Bombing and other military activity that of course have killed lots of Americans as well as those vague Muslims whose lives don't matter at all till they immigrate here, whereupon their lives seem to become far more important than any of ours.

No. Everybody knows about all that but nobody seems to care except right-wing bigots like me, who'd prefer not to bomb all those Muslims, because, unlike liberals and neocons, we actually respect human life. I realize that such old-fashioned sensibilities are pretty feeble in comparison with new moral principles like pretending that men who pretend they're women actually are women instead of the men that they appear to be, but we're trying, honest we are.

But I'm not talking about that public-knowledge stuff. Nope.

Nor am I talking about Vince Foster —that is, I'm not talking only about Vince Foster, as there are over a hundred or so such Vince Fosters, some of them far more spectacular than plain old VF himself. What do you suppose they tell Chelsea about what happened to all those aunts and uncles?
We may never know.

Yeah, the memes are cute but unfortunately they refer to real stuff.  When I think about the silly murder conspiracy murders involving other presidents who wouldn't hurt a fly, the indifference of the press to the Clintons' misbehavior is pretty outrageous.

And no, I'm not talking about Bill's skirt-chasing, though that's connected,

I'm talking about their cold-blooded murders. And yes, there are plenty. If you think an Arkansas redneck and his hideous wife can't be as murderous as a bunch of Corleones, you are naive. This is from Takimag:

A Hot Month for Clinton’s Body Count

Donald Trump threatened to kill Hillary Clinton last Tuesday. The Secret Service came to visit him and he’s looking at five years in prison. It’s all conjecture, of course, but that passes for cold, hard evidence this election and that’s because the whole thing is rigged. The media is completely in the tank for Hillary and they neither see, nor hear, nor speak of Hillary’s evil. Hey, guys, if you’re looking for murders, check out anyone who has ever crossed the Clintons. There are about 100 cases where some intern has slept with Bill or some lawyer knew too much or some investigator got too close and boom—he shoots himself in the back of the head at the top of a mountain at four in the morning. 
The media cared about the sheer number of cases when 57 women said Bill Cosby raped them. If we brought the Hillary kill list down to 57, you’d be dealing with only the really, really spooky ones. Like the one last month where a DNC staffer, who may very well have supplied Julian Assange with the classified emails that brought massive embarrassment to the party, was shot in the back of the head in the middle of the night. 
Seth Rich was talking to his girlfriend on the phone when a gunman came up behind him, shot him to death, and left without taking anything at all. Rich was in a nice neighborhood that I’m told hadn’t had a murder in six years. The Assange link got eye rolls from the left until he personally offered a $20K reward for any information leading to an arrest. A Dutch TV host pressed Julian on this and asked if it was a murder accusation directed at Hillary and the subject quickly died.
The list of victims goes on and on and on, and Google is happy to tell you how serious the accusations are and how tenuous the link is. You’ll likely come across left-wing bias where they pooh-pooh the link, but peel back another layer and it’s only a fraction of a percent less scary than you thought. 
Take the case of John Ashe, who was choked by his own barbells in June. The U.N. official was on trial for taking bribes from Chinese billionaire David Ng, a.k.a. Ng Lap Seng. Snopes wants you to know it’s a myth that it had anything to do with Hillary and even my buddy Steve Crowder claims, “He wasn’t going to be testifying against Hillary at any time.” The NY Post disagrees and claims that “the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng.” This seems likely as an ABC News story from last year reported on Ng’s multiple visits with the Clintons in 1997 when he was photographed having meetings with them. So Ashe is looking at prison time for dealing with a corrupt billionaire who has a history with Hillary Clinton. He could likely negotiate a leaner sentence if he had some information to impart, but he wouldn’t be able to impart it if his windpipe were crushed by a barbell (who the hell gets killed by their own barbell?). 
Read the whole article here:
http://takimag.com/article/a_hot_month_for_clintons_body_count_gavin_mcinnes/print#ixzz4IGXUfJ51
---------
After printing this, I got a dissenting reply. Joel Eagelston thinks I'm wrong about this. He said there's no evidence the Clintons are serial killers. I asked:

Open question. Do you doubt that the media would continue to protect them if they were?

Joel Eagelston Yes, I doubt it very much. Very little is secret in the world anymore. All of these deaths in the "Clinton Body Count" were investigated by police who were doing their jobs. Hell, Vince Foster's death was investigated FIVE SEPARATE TIMES, with four of those investigations being conducted by Republicans and three by Clinton's political enemies. They all came to the conclusion that it was a suicide by a man unprepared for the viciousness of Washington life, and who was being set up as the fall guy for Clinton's firing of the Travel Office staffers. He spiraled into a deep depression and was good enough at hiding it that nobody noticed.

It's the same way with the other deaths on that list. Ron Brown was killed in a tragic airplane crash, but people want to believe he was shot in the head at some point as well. Paul Tully, who's usually the third or fourth name on these lists, was a 400-lb alcoholic chainsmoker, but we're supposed to find it suspicious that he died of a heart attack.

And this isn't just limited to right-wingers. I lived in Eugene, Oregon, when Minnesota Sen. Paul Wellstone died in a plane crash, and the treehugger crowd was convinced that the Republican National Committee had either sabotaged the plane or shot it down so Norm Coleman could take his seat in the Senate.

Real life deaths are often boring and banal. People feel that being shot by a lone nut or dying in a car crash or from food poisoning or whatever is too trivial an end for their heroes, so they attach all sorts of sexy-sounding and fascinating conspiracies to those deaths, so as to magnify the importance of the death.

In the Clintons' case, we have the opposite: in an effort to demonize this controversial couple, someone took everybody the Clintons ever knew who has died and strung the deaths together to make them seem like something more than they were. This often includes word games such as changing "died from a heart attack" to "died under mysterious circumstances. Later ruled a 'heart attack'" or saying someone committed suicide when they didn't. People are in a such a rush to hate the Clintons that they seize on it as proof of their evil or whatever.

Actual quibcag: Cute, huh? Found girl at Reddit.